I
got this comment on my last entry and as I started to type up a reply, I
realized that it was rather lengthy, so I decided to make it a separate
entry. (Hope you don’t mind,
Benoit!)
Below
is Benoit’s comment:
“Very interesting but if:
"I am fairly confident that Thatcher would have never authorized the use of the NDB’s during the Falklands conflict"
then, why did she support to bring them there? I cannot imagine she was not aware of the embedded NBD's. What is your opinion?
Kind regards,
Benoit”
"I am fairly confident that Thatcher would have never authorized the use of the NDB’s during the Falklands conflict"
then, why did she support to bring them there? I cannot imagine she was not aware of the embedded NBD's. What is your opinion?
Kind regards,
Benoit”
So
here is my reply:
My
opinion is fairly much in line with the official MoD’s document, as it is the
only logical reason for sending the NDB’s to the Falklands Conflict.
Thatcher
would have most certainly had known of their existence. I also believe that even with her reputation
as the ‘Iron Lady’ and regardless of the ultra-left’s opinion of her, she was
smart enough to know that the use of nuclear weapons against a Third World
nation that had no nuclear weapons and opposed no global or Home Islands threat
would have been not only been political suicide, but national suicide for the UK in all
future global relations, if not to provide an excuse for the Warsaw Pact the
use for military intervention into the conflict. The USSR was neutral to the conflict as the
Argentine junta was furiously anti-communist, but the use of a nuclear device
would have sent them in to panic. I also believe that she probably
pushed the MoD to address the issue to relocate the NDB’s to the deep magazine
ships so not to violate the Treaty of Tlatelolco.
I am
sure that her MoD's advisors explained the reasons for needing to keep the NDB’s
with the task force and that she agreed with them. How hard they would had to persuade her
would be a difficult question to answer, but with her history of a hard stance,
I would say, “probably not much at all.”
The
logic with keeping the NDB’s with the task force was two main reasons, which
were also covered in the MoD’s document.
The first one is related to the actual operational timeline for the
mission to retake the Falklands islands.
As stated, had the task force stopped at the Ascension Island to also to
off-load the NDB’s, they would have lost an additional 36 hours,
estimated. This would have meant that
operations would have delayed two more days.
With the sever winter season approaching fast, this was a critical
factor. Had they waited, and not knowing
how the weather would be like, it was very likely that they would have to call
off the operation without reaching a final objective (forcing the Argentine
forces into a position to call for surrender.)
Had the task force failed to reach that objective before the winter called
off the operations, The UK might have been force into a treaty with Argentina
to accept their claim to the islands and to forced into an agreement similar to
China at that time with Hong Kong. The
second part to this actual operational timeline was that by sitting at the
Ascension Islands two more days could have possibly allowed the Argentine
forces to spot the route of the task force and to intercept it with their
submarines. While in reflection this
turn out to be a false fear, but for the protection of the task force it could
not be overlooked.
The
second reason is the UK’s commitment to NATO.
While looking back, we could see that there was not a great chance of
war between the NATO vs. Warsaw Pact during the period, but it was always a
threat. Keep in mind that the
international war game, Able Archer 1983, was only about 18 months later and there
are conflicting accounts on how close we came to a war with the Warsaw Pact
over that. (Actually, this would even make a cool campaign tie-in for a post Falklands game and excuse to do a USSR naval campaign!) Had the task force off loaded
their NDB’s at Ascension Island or the Home Islands, if a war would have broke
out between NATO and the Warsaw Pact, the task force would have been in
trouble. Not only would they have been
without a much needed resource for destroying ballistic missile submarines
(better to have an assured kill, verse a crippled sub that can still launch
before being hit again), but it had to sailed to Ascension Islands first and
take roughly 60 hours or less to reload the NDB’s. It could also be possible that the Soviet
intelligence could figure out that the NDB’s were located there and set up a
trap for the task force.
Cheers,
Sapper
No comments:
Post a Comment